• May 21, 2012, 02:31:17 PM *
  • Welcome, Guest

Can I interest you in REGISTERING an account? To get started click here to register!

Username: Password: Login for:


Hello and welcome to www.OpenBookSociety.com! Thanks for joining up! We hope this will become your new online book haven! :)
 
Please put your birthday information in when you register - that will allow you to see the mature section!

So, you are here...Now what?!
-We only have a few guidelines, please check them out before posting: http://forum.openbooksociety.com/forum-guidelines/forum-guidelines/

-Drop by the Introduce Yourself section on the Forum and tell us about you. Don't be shy, we won't bite you...yet. Winking

-You are now free to roam and post wherever and however you like! So, what are you waiting for?!
 
If you get lost or have questions, feel free to contact any staff member, anytime.
 
Have fun!
-Open Book Society Staff

 
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Battle: L.A.  (Read 363 times)
Rose
Literary Queen
Book Scholar
******
Offline Offline
CHAT
Posts: 1825


Rose


« on: March 14, 2011, 10:39:49 AM »

MOVIE REVIEW: BATTLE L.A.



Written by OBS Staff Member Rose

Sci-fi thriller Battle L.A. (directed by Jonathan Liebesman) is a classic example by which one can use the saying “It’s all relative”. What the average moviegoer wanted and the critics aspiration for this film where polar opposites. The critics, who panned this film something awful, got it very wrong.

To put it plainly, Battle L.A. is awesome. Leave all your doubts behind and do not, I repeat DO NOT listen to the critics. The film delivers exactly what it’s meant to — jarring battle scenes, destruction, alien induced mayhem and griping tension. Sure it’s a cross between War of the Worlds (2005) and Black Hawk Down (2001). Yes, it’s reminiscent of Cloverfield (2008), the style of in-your-face, hand held, frenetic camera movement, and it does take an eye adjustment, but after a good 10 minutes it’s unnoticeable. Enough back-story is given so you empathize with the characters and the dialogue is not as curt as Roger Ebert makes it out to be.

Aaron Eckhart does a fantastic job portraying Staff Sergeant Michael Nantz, a veteran Marine who is set to retire from duty when he gets called to the ultimate combat mission. Nantz and his unit which consists of 2nd Lieutenant William Martinez (Ramon Rodriguez), Cpl Jason Lockett (Cory Hardrict), Cpl Kevin Harris (Ne-Yo), and Cpl Nick Stavrou, are deployed to downtown Santa Monica with the intension of saving any remaining civilians before the big bomb drop to wipe out the aliens in the last stand in the battle for Los Angeles.

This film is not meant to massage and stimulate moviegoers intellectually. If you want that kind of film, go see The King’s Speech. Battle L.A. is pure entertainment and that it does tenfold. From start to finish the energy and fast-paced action strap you in for a hellavah ride. It pains me when critics have to pick apart the fact that the alien space ships resemble a mash up of trash compactors crushed metal, or complain ad nauseam about how the marines find a way to kill the aliens, (by shooting it underneath where the heart would be), or there were inconsistencies that were so apparent. You might notice one, but for 99% of the film you forget you’re in a movie theater.  Embrace Battle L.A. for what it is, a kick-ass alien invasion flick.

It lacked the drippy patriotism of Independence Day and intricate details of why the aliens invaded earth and it was refreshing. Newscasters surmised it was for our resources, namely water and that is good enough for me. Add in saucy Michelle Rodriguez who can hold her own, portraying Air Force Sergeant Elena Santos, and the testosterone earth-saving marine unit was complete.

Bridget Moynahan however, who played a civilian found by the Marines unit, was a total waste of space. Take her out of the film and you would never notice she was missing. I gather her agent really pushed for her to get this role.

One thing about this film resonated strongly and that is the mentality of our Marines. They never leave a man behind, show the utmost bravery and fight with honor. But I didn’t need a movie to tell me that.

I am happy this film wasn’t a disappointment, was embraced by the public and managed to earn over $35 million this weekend and came in at number one at the box office. It proves that sometimes you simply can’t trust the critics.

But you can trust the average reviewer and I say go see this film, it’s great entertainment. Retreat…hell!

Rated: 9/10

Running time: 116 minutes

Rated: PG-13
Logged

    twitter / whatategilbertg
Staar84
Book Scholar
***
Offline Offline
CHAT
Posts: 1551



« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2011, 06:45:55 PM »


This film is not meant to massage and stimulate moviegoers intellectually. If you want that kind of film, go see The King’s Speech. Battle L.A. is pure entertainment and that it does tenfold.

I totally agree with you, I thought it kicked ass. I kind of measure how good a movie is based on whether or not I'd buy the dvd, and I'm totally getting this one on blu ray. A friend of mine said this was the dumbest movie he's seen in awhile. So I know longer trust his judgment. I've read a lot of bad reviews for this, including one that said it would have bee better with less talking. The only change I would have made would be to shorten Nantz' motivational speech.  I liked how vague it was on why they were here--cause it's not really important.

Logged

                            
Rose
Literary Queen
Book Scholar
******
Offline Offline
CHAT
Posts: 1825


Rose


« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2011, 06:03:03 PM »

Quote
A friend of mine said this was the dumbest movie he's seen in awhile.

Wow. Coming from a guy, that's really strange.   Speaking of judgement, I read a lot of the reviews (half way - so as not to be spoiled much) - before I went to see it. I am so glad I did not listen to them.

Quote
including one that said it would have bee better with less talking.

That's a hoot, for Roger Ebert ripped the film a new one over the fact mere one word orders were shouted out most of the film. (ie: not enough dialogue)

There were critics who panned War of the Worlds. I LOVE that film. Watch it every single time it's on. Battle L.A. and Worlds are quite similar. It was knocked for that fact too. I don't see a point in knocking a film cause it's like another...cause everything is re-worked these days.

High-five for liking it too.  clappingguy   Winking


Logged

    twitter / whatategilbertg
Alovethatsnotsupposedtobe
Book Scholar
***
Offline Offline
CHAT
Posts: 1615


Katie


« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2011, 04:48:17 PM »

See at first I didn't want to see this because I thought it looked a bit like Skyline and I thought that was the worst movie I have seen in a really long time. But I got suckered in to going and I'm glad I did. I just got back from seeing it and I really liked it.
*possible spoiler below*
Although I was totally sad when they killed 'Hoyt' Lol okay I know it really wasn't Hoyt but just the fact that the actor who plays him was in the movie, I kept thinking please don't kill poor sweet adorable, Hoyt. But at the end when he said he would go up and call in the message I knew it was the end for him.
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Top Twilight Sites Top 21 Twilight Sites Twilight Poison Topsite  Top 21 Celebrity Sites Top 21 Book Sites Top Book Sites